Court Throws Out Rapper Drake's Legal Case Over Kendrick Lamar’s Hit Not Like Us
A judge has dismissed the rapper Drake’s legal claim against the music corporation over Kendrick Lamar's song Not Like Us.
Presiding Judge Jeannette Vargas decided that the rapper’s lyrics, which claimed the artist and his associates of being "pedophiles", were "protected opinion" and could not be considered defamatory.
Drake filed the legal action in January, claiming Universal Music Group, the record label representing the two rappers, of defamation by permitting the track to be released and marketed, stating it disseminated a "false and malicious narrative".
The artist’s spokesperson stated he intended to appeal the ruling. UMG said it was pleased with the outcome and was looking forward to continuing its collaboration with the rapper.
Background of the Rap Battle
Not Like Us, which was first dropped in spring 2024, was broadly viewed as the final strike in an continuing feud between the competing artists.
It has emerged as the biggest hit of Lamar's musical journey, having received multiple Grammy awards and being one of the most-discussed highlights of his Super Bowl half-time show in February.
In a detailed ruling, Judge Vargas called the dispute between the artists "the most infamous rap battle in the history of rap music".
"Both rappers’ series of diss tracks was a 'verbal conflict' that was the subject of substantial media scrutiny and online discourse," the court wrote.
"Although the claim that plaintiff is a child predator is certainly a grave allegation, the broader context of a intense musical rivalry, with incendiary language and offensive accusations exchanged by each artist, would not lead the reasonable listener to believe that 'Not Like Us' imparts verifiable facts about plaintiff."
She additionally observed that, in an previous track, the artist had "challenged his rival to make the pedophile claims" that appeared in Not Like Us.
On the song his own release, Drake used the synthetic vocals of the late rapper to suggest strategies on how to win the rap battle.
"Suggest he has a preference for minors, consider that a tip," the track proposed.
"It is in this context in which such lines as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be assessed," wrote Judge Vargas.
"The parallel in the phrasing strongly indicates that this line is a direct callback to the artist’s own words in the prior song."
'An Affront to Artists'
Drake, whose legal name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not name Lamar in the legal filing.
His legal team alleged the label of launching "an effort to create a viral hit" out of a track that made the "untrue claim that Drake is a criminal paedophile, and to imply that the public should turn to extra-legal action in retaliation".
Deciding against Drake, the judge said listeners would not expect "truthful accounts" from a diss track "replete with vulgar language, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language."
She pointed out that Drake himself had used comparable rhetoric, referencing a line in which the artist "strongly" implied that "Lamar is a spouse beater", and a separate instance where he "raps that he 'was told' that one of Lamar's children may not be his biological offspring."
Regarding the track in question, the court said: "Although apparent statements of fact may take on the nature of statements of opinion... when made in open discourse, heated labour dispute, or similar situations in which an audience may anticipate the use of epithets, passionate language or hyperbole."
Reacting to the dismissal, a label spokesperson said: "From the outset, this lawsuit was an insult to every creative and their creative expression and should not have seen the light of day."
"We are satisfied with the court's dismissal and look forward to resuming our partnership effectively promoting Drake's music and investing in his artistic path," the representative added.
A representative for Drake said the artist planned to appeal the decision, "and we await the appellate court reviewing it".
Lamar has not yet comment on the legal matter.